Coffee with Kathy
Politics • Business
Whether we like it or not, politics determines our future. To stay in control of our future, we need to stay informed. Taboo as it may be, it's time to talk politics!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
Another federal let down that may have blazed a path to a solution

The federal government demonstrated, yet again, they have no intention of ever caring about our province and the people who live here. Albertans were not just forced out of their homes, many lost their homes because of an out-of-control forest fire that started in Jasper National Park.

The amount of people overly eager to blame our Premier was quite entertaining. It was pointed out over and over that Jasper National Park is a national park, not a provincial one, and therefore under federal jurisdiction. Even with screenshots and links to confirm, it was like listening to children argue back. “Ya… well… it still her fault because the municipality falls under provincial jurisdiction, so, so, there!” (*stomps foot before turning to stomp away).

Yes, Municipalities are under Provincial jurisdiction. It took putting a few Provincial Bills in the works to remind both Municipal and Federal leaders of that, but they are finally figuring it out. However, that does not change the fact that the park itself is still under Federal jurisdiction.

One commenter on X wasn’t deterred. “Well, if your house burns down because your neighbors house three doors down caught fire, is that your neighbor’s fault?!?” (*crosses arms and gives snotty ‘whaddya-gotta-say-about-that?’ look)

If that neighbor’s yard was nothing but a tinder box just waiting for a match to light it, then yes, it’s completely their fault. And that’s essentially what the federal government did to Albertans who call Jasper home. Thanks mostly to a pine beetle infestation, millions of hectares of forest has been dead for years now, yet no one in Ottawa did anything about it. Then a fire started in Jasper National Park, probably from lightning. Given the copious amounts of fuel in the form of dead trees, both standing and laying all over the forest floor, federal firefighters assigned to the park couldn’t get it under control. Then it was too late, the fire swooped into town with absolute ferocity, and now a third of it is gone.

The damage done by this fire was completely preventable, no matter what anyone says. The federal government, along with their top-heavy overpaid bureaucrats, knew this day was imminent yet did nothing to prevent it. That tells us what they think of Albertans. Many will chime in and say next year is an election year, the Conservatives are poised to win a majority, then it’ll be ok. Do you really think so? Bureaucrats and administration positions are unelected and the same people will still be there. Is Poilievre going to do some mass firing of those who allowed this fire to happen? It's very doubtful.

Alberta has five of the forty-nine National Parks. The federal government has just proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, they do not have the same sentiment as Albertans do when it comes to the land within our province. This should give us pause for thought. If those parks were handed over the provinces, the benefits for everyone would be as massive as the mountains themselves.

The first benefit would be managing the money that manages the parks. By transferring ownership of the five parks here in our province to our provincial government, Canadians across the country would realize an instant tax savings. Here is how:

  • Provincial tax dollars would now be invested and to offset that, the income generated form those parks would go to the province rather than the federal government.

  • It’s much easier to hold provincial politicians accountable than it is federal.

  • Moreover, Albertans could rightfully argue that much of our equalization money can now stay here because we’ve taken on the responsibility of looking after five more parks.

The second benefit is also related to money and that’s jobs. We could ensure that employment generated in these parks goes to Albertans first. Any contract work would be tendered out to Alberta based companies rather than those with federal contacts. Even more savings for taxpayers.

The third benefit is the most important. People always take care of their own backyard first. Albertans consider these parks our playground and treat them with utmost respect. Just as we do with our Provincial Parks, we would ensure these five parks were looked after very well. Forestry management, animal care and preservation, fire response would all be brought under provincial jurisdiction. Picture it! No more obnoxiously overpriced snipers hanging out of helicopters making a mockery of thinning herds, and no more millions of hectares of land filled with dead trees ready to burn at any time. Instead, Alberta hunters could harvest the animals for free and forestry could get in and clean up the trees before lightning hits. What a concept!

There is also a ‘bonus benefit’. By bringing the National Parks under provincial jurisdiction, we’re much less beholden to these nonsensical ‘agreements’ the federal government signs onto with global entities regarding land use. That’s a big deal as we’ve seen already with many of our municipalities.

The next question is how do we do this, and that is a good question. This fire may have just blazed a path to a solution. If Poilievre has any aspiration to strengthen his friendship with the West, perhaps we’ve found our leverage.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Posts
Articles
The Silent Fringe Majority has Awakened

In the six years that I have been involved in this movement, I often wondered what it would look like when we got to this stage. What we are seeing is not what I pictured.

Driving up highway 43 the other day, embarking on the Mighty Peace is like singing that old John Denver song, ‘Country Road, take me home, to the place I belong’. Any excuse to come back is relished, so when I was asked to participate in a northern Alberta tour, there was only one answer to that question.

My first stop was Fox Creek. From work trucks to minivans, young men and women in work boots to retirees, hundreds showed up and the line to sign never stopped. The next night in Fairview was just as impressive. From strollers to walkers, they just kept coming. That night we asked how many were attending their first political event? With over 100 people in the room, a clear majority put up their hands. It was incredible. Tonight, we’re in Grand Prairie, tomorrow Beaverlodge, Saturday Edson, and then I head back to ...

December 02, 2025
Managing hesitations

It happened quite a number of times over the weekend. “Hey, I saw you speaking at (name of the town).” It was a little surreal, and almost every time a short discussion about independence followed. Watching those around us was the best part. Some would join in the conversation while others would just listen. All the same, the want for dialog was tangible.

Of course, not all are persuaded that independence is the way to go. Others are sort of for independence but still have hesitations. When chatting with either, I would always say something like, “And that is okay. This is a big deal for all Albertans and ought not be taken lightly. As long as you do your homework and come to your decision via facts rather than emotion or someone else’s opinion, that is what matters.” The looks on most people’s faces was often a strange combination of perplexity and comfort. Before long, a bridge was built and a conversation would follow.

One couple I met was a lot of fun. He was all in, she was not. Turning to the ...

What does the federal election mean for Albertans?

To understand the present, we need to look at the past. Especially when it comes to politics.

Though our province was colonized into Confederation in 1905, our history goes back further than that. The Europeans started showing up in the 1600’s and the Hudson’s Bay Company laid claim to most of central and southern Alberta in 1670. Fur traders and explorers came on the scene breaking trail, making maps, and creating commerce at every opportunity. Today, we have highways (Anthony Henday), buildings (Peter Pond Mall), and even a resort (David Thompson Resort) named after a few of them.

On July 1, 1867 Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick became The Dominion of Canada under the British Commonwealth. Not long after that, Alberta and Saskatchewan became territories of the Province of the Northwest Territories. Over the next handful of decades, the other provinces negotiated their place in Confederation as well.

The Minister of the Interior, Sir Clifford Sifton, had a vision for the Province of the Northwest Territories. The ...

We are not the same, and probably never were.

The political differences between Alberta and the rest of Canada, could not have been more perfectly illustrated than through the events of last weekend.

After Jagmeet Singh completely annihilated the party, the NDP finally decided they need a new Leader. A convention was held and, after watching the clips, it truly is a wonder anything got accomplished at all. One could appreciate delegates spending most of their time and energy making Points of Order if there were some sort of contentious party business being dealt with. But that was not the case. Peppered among those Points of Order were several Points of Personal Privilege.

Typically, at these things there are two colored cards: green to vote ‘yes’ and red to vote ‘no’. Not at this convention. Multiple cards were on full display and they all meant something. The skin color and/or culture and/or part of the lgbtq community she/her/he/him/they/their/them identified with determined the color of card. The more marginalized the delegate was, the more preferential treatment they received, including the ability to butt in line. If a delegate felt they were not receiving the preferential treatment he/him/she/her/they/them/their deserved, that delegate would make a Point of Personal Privilege and let everyone else know about it. Those who scream ‘inclusivity’ were literally in a race to the bottom.    

The Leadership Race also became a race to the bottom. The provincial NDP Leaders for Alberta and Saskatchewan expressed great displeasure with the winner and immediately got to work distancing themselves from him. At the end of the day, the NDP party is much like the Borg in Star Trek. The provincial arms cannot decouple from the federal. They are one, but obviously not united.

While all of that was going on, equally cringe worthy were the Juno Awards. A Liberal who’s who that very few Canadians bother to watch, which explains why it is entirely government funded.   

Meanwhile, back in Alberta, where critical thinking and sanity still exist, around 700 people gathered in Calgary for Shaun Newman’s Cornerstone Forum. Attendees were treated to conversations on geopolitics, economics, genuine expert debates on today’s issues, with a segment on personal growth mixed in. Real dialogue with real people about the issues that should matter most to everyone. There was no way not to leave informed, enlightened, and exhausted. And the only cards exchanged were business cards.   

In a way, these three events shed even more light on what fuels the Independence Movement. The vast majority of Albertans identify with those who attended the Cornerstone Forum. Most Canadians do not. In short, we don’t have much in common with the rest of Canada. We are not the same and probably never were. And it’s time for Albertans to move on, and that is okay. Those who live in other provinces will disagree and that is okay, too. They can, but going our own way is not their choice to make. It’s ours. And we will.       

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Provincial budget highlights the need for Alberta Independence

Now that we have had time to digest the latest provincial budget, it is hard not to notice how it highlights why we need to become our own nation. Much of our provincial deficit is directly due to federal policy. With no ‘business case’ for selling our natural gas and doing everything possible to keep our oil in ground, there is not nearly the royalty money coming in that could and should be. Add to that the flood in immigration to our province, both legal and illegal, means there are some tough conversations we need to have.  

During the teachers strike we learned about complex classrooms and the need for a lot more support. An incredibly large number of students speak little to no English. This also brings a plethora of associated behavioral problems that teachers and other students are having to contend with. The stories kids are sharing with their parents when they get home from school is unlike any generation before. In short, the added pressure on our education system is taking a toll on everyone and has created a collision course with chaos for all involved.

More money is needed to hire more staff, particularly specialized staff. Obviously. However, there is a problem. Our education system is experiencing a significant vacuum in funding. The parents of these students have not been here long enough to have contributed tax dollars to help support the very system they are putting the excess pressure on. And though the NDP and ATA both believe there to be a money tree outside the Legislature somewhere, having walked the grounds a number of times now, I have yet to see it.   

Healthcare funding is also stretched for much the same reason as education. Again, with an influx of people moving here, added pressure has been put on our healthcare system. What should be obvious to all yet isn’t, is our ‘free’ healthcare is not actually free. There is a cost to every service that is provided and those costs are covered by our tax dollars. However, just like with the education system, those who just got here have yet to contribute any money into this system either. Which means they literally are getting healthcare services for free while working Albertans pay for it. It was also discovered that more Alberta healthcare numbers have been generated and used than people living in Alberta, which is healthcare fraud. So, they too are getting healthcare for free while working Albertans pay for it.  

How we got to this place mostly lands at the feet of the federal government. Vetting potential immigrants and controlling the number of them is federal responsibility. Not only have they unequivocally failed in that obligation, they admit it with no apology and are announcing plans to make things even worse. Once people get into the country, moving around from province to province is easy. The ‘Alberta is Calling’ campaign that former Premier Kenney began, and our current Premier has continued, is where the province is to blame. That program needs to stop.  

Getting control of immigration is key in helping to manage provincial coffers. Rather than burdening Alberta taxpayers, there is another option. What our Provincial government could do is halt all education and healthcare services for non-Canadians until Albertans decide in a referendum if we are willing to continue bearing the burden of supporting them. The majority may decide yes, they may decide no. There is only one way to find out.

Furthermore, our Provincial government needs to pass two laws:

1)      Only Canadian citizens, over the age of 18, who have ordinarily resided in Alberta for a minimum of twelve months prior to provincial and municipal elections, referendums, and plebiscites can vote; and

2)      Proof of valid Canadian citizenship is required to vote in all provincial and municipal elections, referendums, and plebiscites. For those who were not born here, citizenship must be held for a minimum of twelve months prior to the voting date.

For some this might be controversial, perhaps even harsh. But there is no other way to ensure the integrity of all our government systems and services is maintained. The federal government won’t do it, so we have to. Which is all the more reason to continue exploring the option of becoming our own nation. Once we get there, much of this will no longer be an issue. Until then, we need to protect what we have in order to build a better future for all. Including those who may want to call Alberta home in years to come.  

Read full Article
My experience participating in a public for/against Alberta Independence conversation

When it comes to politics, my experience with those on the left has never been great. Not long ago, many wanted me dead (literally), and said so, simply because of my political beliefs. Others have ‘unfriended’ me because we disagreed on something. Last year, I even went to an NDP event in hopes of coming away with some understanding of their point of view. While trying to find at least a sliver of common ground to build a bridge upon, the person sitting next to me made it clear the bridge was out.  

‘Should we stay or should we go?’ is a very polarizing question that should be non-partizan. In November a gentleman who feels the same invited me to discuss it at a public forum and it was a lot of fun! And I really mean that. He asked if I would consider doing it again and, of course, I said yes. A semi-retired Unitarian minister who helped with the Forever Canada campaign was willing to represent the ‘stay’ side, and the event was booked.  

With no idea how many would attend, it was hard not to think I could be walking into the Lion’s Den. A lot of prayer went into this event and not just mine. As I walked in the door, nervousness was replaced with peace and some friendly familiar faces. It was a quaint gathering of around 25-30 of us at the Ukrainian Centre on 97st. The speakers would each have thirty minutes to state their case, followed by Q&A with the audience, and five minutes for closing remarks.

If the thoughts and ideologies shared by the Unitarian minister reflect all involved in the Forever Canada campaign, I learned a lot about how they perceive us. It quickly became a left verses right issue, peppered with disparaging remarks about our Premier and Conservatives in general. Sadly, not unexpected.

Though my political leanings are well known, I keep my presentation to facts. Taking the audience on a short journey through our history followed by current headlines, the intention is to help people see where we are and how we got here. Within the headline portion we see that our prisons are filling up with non-Canadians, human trafficking is out of control, and cultural uprisings are a real problem. Very unapologetically, I say to every audience before me that those who come to Canada and then hurt us need to go home. A woman sitting in the front row was visibly troubled during this part of the presentation and I wondered why. From what or whose angle was she seeing this? During the question-and-answer portion I found out.

Filled with emotion and angst toward me, “Do you know how MAGA, ultra-right-wing, racist, Nigel Farag-like you sound telling these people to go home??” She was upset and went on for a few minutes more. Then it was my turn to respond.

Me: “Do you lock your doors?”

Her: “Of course.”

Me: “Would you be upset if someone broke in, wrecked your house, stole from you, and hurt your family?”

Her: “Of course, but we invited these people in to become part of our social fabric and have a better life here. We need to welcome them….” and she continued to expand on that thought for another minute or so.

Me: “Okay. If you invite someone into your home, feed them, give them a place to sleep, shelter, etc., and then they ransack it, hurt your kids, and take advantage of you, you would be alright with that?”

She struggled trying to respond and never did truly answer the question. I was as perplexed with her ideology as she was with mine. What, or where, is the disconnect between us? How can it be that two women who both just want to make the world around us a better place, hold such opposing views?

The following day I received a Facebook message from another attendee who also had a problem with the headlines, particularly the one about human trafficking. She questioned what connection it has to Alberta separatism, except as a racist assumption about immigrants. Now there was a theme. Pointing out just a few of the facts regarding how our federal government manages immigration upset these women to the core. But why? The facts are the facts. How can they be denied? Then the a-ha moment came.

This is ‘white guilt’. There are some who believe that calling out the crimes of those who are not white is wrong. Furthermore, wanting justice for those who were hurt by them makes us racist, misogynist, colonialist, and so on. It is an ideology we have all heard and read about. Here I experienced it in real time.

For the record, Alberta Independence has absolutely nothing to do with race, skin color, or any other identifiable human trait. None of us care about any of that. This movement is about correcting the wrongs that have been done toward all Albertans for generations. Most of whom came as immigrants, many of whom really were discriminated against terribly when they arrived. Many of us are descendants of those immigrants. Yours truly is among them whose paternal side came here, narrowly missing the horrors of Holodomor (how apropos that we were at the Ukrainian Centre).

Standing up for generations of political wrongdoing against Albertans gets us accused of all sorts of things we are nowhere near guilty of. I am also constantly reminded that there will always be those for whom our message will never reach. And that’s okay.

Though I walked in to the Ukrainian Centre that night expecting the worst, I walked away pleasantly surprised. Despite this being an emotional topic, everyone was quite polite, most were attentive, and the passive aggressive jabs sent my way were at a much lower key than anticipated. To the gentleman who hosted it, I cannot commend him enough. In politics, opposites do not attract. Ever. Bringing us together in one room took remarkable courage, and for that I am very grateful.

Though no common ground was ever found that evening, the bridge wasn’t completely out. There was a small speck of agreement between the Unitarian minister and I. We both concur that this referendum really is the only way to ensure all of our voices are heard.

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals