Good News!!! The early majority are ready and the late majority are now exploring the idea. How do I know this? Have I got a story for you!
Amongst the crowd at a recent APP event was a man with questions. He found some answers but came away wanting more information and an idea as to how to get it. A friend introduced us, the following week he held a public event, and I was invited to be one of the presenters. The topic: should we stay or should we go.
Because it is imperative to meet people where they are at, I chatted extensively with my host before the event in order to know my audience and come prepared. Very much on the left side of the political spectrum, as were those he was inviting, it only made sense to changed up my presentation a bit to suit their thought process and speak to what is important to them. My hope was the already converted in attendance would find the information useful as well.
The coin was tossed and I got to present first.
While describing how the Westminster System is designed, two young men became so offended they grabbed their backpacks and left. The truth can be uncomfortable. Especially when it goes against everything you were taught, or weren’t taught but believed. Unfortunately, the offenses didn’t stop there.
With slides to confirm facts, I pointed out that Alberta’s total global greenhouse gas emissions amount to 0.5%. That same slide listed the top ten global emitters with Canada in #11 place at 1.41%. Suggesting we could double production, raising our provinces GHG emissions to just 1% (which is still very negligible on a global scale), we could then sell that increased production to China, the US, and India so they wouldn’t need to use coal anymore. The realized benefit would be a significant decrease in their GHG emissions by multiple percents and we could have better schools and hospitals. A win-win.
There were definitely skeptics in the front row, but I had their attention.
Next stop, Germany.
Germany was in trouble because it went ‘green’ too quick with no plan should things go wrong, and go wrong it did. Pointing out our Prime Minister declared there was ‘no business case’ to help our fellow man in their greatest time of need touched a nerve or two.
It felt like we were getting somewhere so I tried to bring it all together.
Given our own country has landlocked us via bills 48 and 69, the only way we could possibly help the environment and those who desperately need what we have is to remove ourselves from Confederation. Though this very tough crowd wasn’t happy with that suggestion, they couldn’t argue it either.
In what is becoming the norm, no one was willing to represent the ‘stay’ side. To the hosts credit, rather than not have the event, he took the role on himself which was no small task. His daily focus is environmentalism, not Alberta secession. Being very new to the independence conversation, he admitted he did not have enough time to prepare and, therefore, not a lot to share but would do his best. Frankly, he deserves a standing ovation for that.
Well into the evening now, the question of ‘why stay’ remained unanswered. A gentleman from the crowd offered to give it a go and this was my favorite part of the evening. Bravely and valiantly, he tried hard to come up with reasons but couldn’t, and finally admitted so. Struggling to reconcile that in his own mind, I asked him if we could continue talking it through together in front of everyone. Maybe collectively we could come up with at least one reason to stay. He graciously agreed and we had a lovely back and forth that quickly became the best conversation I have ever had on the subject. Respectful, cordial, it was wonderful. We shook hands after and chatted again when the event was over.
The group conversation moved to equalization payments. We talked about how they work and who was going to pay the bills if our oil and gas stayed in the ground (spoiler alert… nobody). We also discussed the trials and tribulations around the social state of the country. Oddly enough, despite being on opposite sides of the Alberta Independence discussion, I realized there was more common ground between us than not. For example:
1) Very few people think Confederation actually works well. It really is the elephant in the room.
2) No one can give a reason as to why we should stay or how we can make things better.
3) The unknowns are the deterrent. Confused minds can’t/won’t make a decision which is why some choose to ignore the issue.
4) That said, most reasonable people really do want to talk about it. What they don’t want is confrontation.
To that last point, within the independence movement are some who… how do I say this nicely… can be a little too emotive while trying to communicate their argument. Civil conversations turn into a boisterous homily about who is ‘right’, followed by accusatory statements flying in all directions, and it’s just ugly. Unfortunately, that happened at this event providing a perfect public display of how conservatives tend to ‘eat our own’. This was not lost on the audience for whom the event was originally intended.
Sadly, it is very possible the actions of these few lost us votes on that referendum and I share this experience with everyone as a loud reminder that this is not the time for personal agendas. With so much on the line, this is no time to lose the plot.

